A Critical Pr?cis of ?The Mystery of Persons and Belief in God by C. S :: essays research papers

A Critical Prcis of The Mystery of Persons and Belief in God by C. Stephen Evans1.Name of author, title, appropriate publishing information, followed by a verb such as argues, believes, reports, and closingly a that clause containing the authors thesis or major assertion.In The Mystery of Persons and Belief in God from the web site http//www.orgins.org/articles/evans_mysterypersons.html, C. Stephen Evans asserts that if we examine human genius and desires with a Christian mindset, we will discover good reasons for believing in God.2.A brief explanation (one paragraph or less) how the author supports and develops his or her thesis. human beingss evil deeds point to our greatness, for only a beast with self-consciousness and plaindom can be truly evil. We are created in the image of God and we were created to enjoy a special relationship with God. We feature imagination and the world-beater of reflective choice. We are creative beings with the power of free choice because we wer e made in the likeness of the Person who created the whole of nature by a free choice. Many people use this power of choice in terrible ways. This does not mean human liberty is an illusion rather that God takes our freedom so seriously that he allows our actions to produce their full consequences. Down through the ages we have been incurably religious. The fight to believe in and worship a higher power is endow in virtually every human culture. The fact that we have a deep need to believe in and find God strongly suggests that God is real.3. A sentence stating the authors purpose for writing.Evans is act to convince the reader that humans were created with the need for God causing us to believe in and worship God hence God is real.4. A sentence identifying the authors audience.Christian-minded believers of God who are seeking produce of Gods existence.5. Your evaluation of what the author wrote (no more than three paragraphs).I found Evans arguments inadequate proof of the ex istence of God. Throughout the article the call if Christianity is true is used repeatedly. The use of an if statement as the fulcrum of his philosophy places the finished philosophy on shaky ground. One would be forced to dramatize the Christian belief system is true, at least the most fundamental concepts, in order to believe in Evans philosophy. Additionally, Evans uses his arguments as particulars to jump to his final conclusion a leap of faith, if you will.