Good vs. Bad Julius Ceasar

In the time of the ruling of Julius Caesar, all of the Romans loved almost of Caesars qualities. He was a good and popular draw and did a lot for the people. But some Romans had a chore with Caesar and plan to kill him. These people were Brutus and Cassius. This started a civil contend amid the Romans. This war may contain been pr counterbalanceted if Brutus and Cassius had done things a discredit differently. Cassius would shake up made a reveal leader or else than Brutus. Cassius also had more of a passion to kill Caesar. Brutus did not have the morals of a killer give palm Caesar did.         As far as war machine strategy goes Cassius had the better mindset for it. Brutus was not a very good military strategist. Cassius knew that it would be a good idea to kill Antony. He perspective that Antony would talk the people into trying to kill Brutus and Cassius even though their intentions were good. But Brutus did not want to make it bear like a live stock bath. Also at Caesars funeral, he trusted Antony to say only good things about Brutus and Cassius and not that they are murderers. When Cassius said that they should kill Antony too, Brutus said he did not want to make it look like a blood bath. He was vengeful and explosive. He argued with Brutus about lying, to the breaker point where they jeopardise each others lives. Cassius said they should not march to difference of opinion of Philippi because it would cloy the troops out and they would not have the advantage of cosmos in their own territory. On the other hand, Brutus thought that if they marched to Philippi they would catch Antonys troops kill guard. Instead of doing what Brutus said, they should have listened to Cassius.         Although they... If you want to get a beneficial essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full es say, visit our page: write my paper